Radial keratotomy was a surgical technique used primarily in the 1970s and 1990s to correct mild to moderate myopia (up to -6 diopters). It involved making radial cuts in the cornea with a diamond knife, weakening its central curvature to flatten it and reduce refractive error.
Invasive procedure: No laser, with risks of corneal irregularities.
Unpredictable results: Could cause irregular astigmatism or night halos.
Discontinued: Replaced by safer techniques such as LASIK, PRK, and SMILE.
❌ No, except in exceptional cases of specific corneal scarring.
Radial keratotomy (RK) was a popular technique in the 1980s and 1990s for correcting myopia through radial corneal incisions. Today, many of these patients develop cataracts and require IOL implantation, but calculating the lens power is complex due to the corneal alterations left by RK.
RK incisions generate irregular central flattening, which distorts measurements of:
Keratometry (K).
Corneal topography.
Traditional formulas (SRK/T, Hoffer Q, Holladay) fail because they assume a spherical cornea.
RK changes the relationship between the anterior and posterior curvature of the cornea, affecting the dioptric power calculation.
Many patients do not remember how many incisions were made or their depth, making planning difficult.
Haigis-L: Less reliant on keratometry.
True-K (Wang-Koch): Adjusted for post-RK corneas.
Barrett True-K formula: Currently the most accurate.
Corneal topography (Pentacam, Galilei) to assess irregularities.
OCT biometry (Lenstar, IOLMaster 700) to measure axial length more accurately.
Therapeutic contact lenses to simulate previous refractive correction.
High-frequency ultrasound if corneal opacities are present.
40% of post-RK patients require postoperative adjustments (such as glasses or special contact lenses) due to calculation errors..
Advantage: Less optical distortion in irregular corneas.
Disadvantage: Need for glasses for near and far vision.
Only if the astigmatism is regular and measurable.
Risk: Difficult alignment due to corneal irregularities.
Option if greater independence from glasses is desired.
Caution: May increase halos in irregular corneas.
Alternative if the cornea is very irregular but the lens is still clear.
In general, multifocal IOLs are NOT the first choice for patients undergoing radial keratotomy (RK) due to the corneal alterations caused by this surgery. However, in selected cases and with a thorough evaluation, they may be considered.
RK causes irregular corneal flattening, which distorts light as it passes through.
Multifocal IOLs depend on a well-centered and symmetrical cornea to function properly.
Risks: Blurred vision, halos, glare, and poor visual quality.
Traditional formulas fail in post-RK corneas (they underestimate or overestimate the power). Even with special formulas (Barrett True-K, Haigis-L), the prediction is less accurate.
Post-RK patients are already often more sensitive to distortions (due to radial scarring).
Multifocal IOLs can aggravate these symptoms, causing dissatisfaction.
Although not ideal, in very controlled situations, a multifocal IOL could be evaluated if:
The cornea has a relatively stable topography (without extreme irregularities).
The patient understands the risks (possible halos, occasional need for glasses).
A newer-generation IOL is used (e.g., an extended-range trifocal, such as the AcrySof IQ PanOptix).
A calculation is performed using advanced formulas (OCT, corneal topography, and contact lens simulation).
Advantage: Maximum visual quality for distance (far or near).
Ideal if the cornea is very irregular.
Corrects astigmatism without introducing additional distortions.
Offers intermediate and distance vision with fewer halos than multifocals.
Example: Tecnis Symfony.
Does not alter the cornea and is reversible.