Book your consultation or get your questions answered
Ablative refractive surgery—using techniques such as LASIK, PRK, or TransPRK—is one of the most precise and predictable procedures in modern ophthalmology. However, not all patients are suitable candidates; proper patient selection is key to achieving safe and stable results.
Below are the fundamental criteria used to determine whether an individual is a candidate for this type of surgery.
To evaluate a patient, two essential assessments are required:
The prescription must be stable. Surgery does not halt the progression of myopia (nearsightedness) or astigmatism; therefore, it is essential that the prescription has remained unchanged for at least one year.
This assessment provides information on:
The shape of the cornea
Its thickness
Its regularity
Any signs of ectasia (bulging) or corneal weakness
Modern refractive surgery is based on mathematical models and physical equations that determine how many diopters can be safely removed from the corneal tissue.
Corneal thickness is measured in microns.
1 millimeter = 1,000 microns
A normal human cornea measures approximately 540–560 microns—that is, slightly more than half a millimeter.
This measurement is crucial because the laser removes microns of tissue to correct the patient’s prescription. The higher the number of diopters being corrected, the more tissue must be removed.
≥ 550 microns
≥ 500 microns
< 490 microns
These latter cases require a highly individualized evaluation: we must ask whether reshaping such a cornea will be safe in the long term, not just in the short term.
Modern equipment allows for more precise treatments, but there are still limits.
Generally speaking, once you exceed 8–9 diopters of myopia (depending on corneal thickness and the ablation profile), the viability of the surgery begins to be called into question.
It is important to understand that the surgery is like sculpting a piece of marble:
The cornea is the marble.
The prescription (refractive error) is the part that must be “carved away.”
We must evaluate how much “marble” is available.
If too much is removed, the remaining tissue may become weak, increasing the risk of corneal ectasia. Sculpted and Polished Marble
If the cornea is too thin, the prescription is too high, or the corneal shape is irregular, there are alternatives:
Phakic intraocular lenses (ICL)
Refractive lens exchange (for older patients)
Combined techniques
However, the global trend—given the extraordinary precision of modern lasers—is to first evaluate whether the patient is a good candidate for ablative (laser) surgery, as it is a procedure that is:
Highly predictable
Very safe
Characterized by a rapid recovery
Associated with an excellent visual outcome
The primary goal is not to “perform surgery for the sake of it,” but rather to improve the patient’s visual quality of life, while always focusing on:
Safety
Scientific evidence
Long-term stability
Predictable results
Correctly determining who is a suitable candidate—and who is not—is just as important as the surgery itself.